Game Laws – What do they exist?

Game Camera World gives hunters reviews and guides on which are the best trail cameras, how to care for them, and how to effectively use them. These could be very helpful to both experienced and amateur hunters. However, being a good hunter is not only about gears and techniques, it is also about being aware of the laws and regulations for hunting as well as understanding it clearly.

Game Laws – What are they?

These are statutes wherein the right to track and seize or kill specific types of fish as well as wild animals (also called game) are regulated. Their range could include:

  • Limiting the number of days to gather or harvest fish or game
  • Controlling the quantity of animals for every person
  • Restricting the kind of species to be harvested
  • Limiting the type of weapons as well as fishing gear utilized in harvesting fish or game

Generally, fishermen, hunters, and legislators concur that the intentions of such statutes is to create and maintain a balance in the preservation, conservation and harvest of both wildlife (game) and fish, which is a necessity. Moreover, game laws are a way of controlling and managing the environment as well as the populations of game and fish. They could also furnish a lawful structure to impose and collect fees for license and other monetary resources which is utilized to finance efforts and initiatives for conservation and to acquire material and information regarding harvest utilized in the practices for wildlife management.

The Lacey Act

Throughout the United States’ early history, insignificant or no interest was given to the devastation of birds and other wildlife. A law that was passed in 1817 in Massachusetts was perhaps the earliest law concerning this matter, wherein it established closed seasons for particular birds and animals that were hunted as game. Ultimately, whether of woodland, field, prairie, or stream, wild game turned out to be protected better. Every state has passed their own game laws and almost all of the states established a commission for game and fish commission as well as game wardens.

The Lacey Act of 1900 (Lacey Act) is a national conservation law wherein that forbids the trade of fish, wildlife, and plants that were unlawfully obtained, owned, transported, or peddled.

Instituted into the US Congress by Iowa Republican Rep. John F. Lacey, the Act was signed on May 25, 1900 by Pres. William McKinley turning in a law. It aims to safeguard both flora and fauna by setting civil and criminal penalizations for individuals who go against the regulations and rules. The law empowers the Interior Secretary to help in the restoration of birds and game in places within United States where they have come to be rare, endangered or extinct. The Lacey Act is still in force and amended several times.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Poised to Legally Block Trump’s New Mexico Importation Tariffs

On the same day (May 30, 2019) when the U.S. – China Trade War negotiations broke down, U.S. president Donald Trump announced that starting June 10, 2019, he will be imposing a five percent (5%) tariff on Mexico importations. The said tariff will increase by another five percent (5%) every month up to October, 2019 until it reaches a max of twenty-five percent (25%).

The uproar against the new tariff imposition is so resounding that no less than the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (USCC) intends to sue Donald Trump. John Murphy, USCC Senior Vice President Of International affairs came out with an announcement that his group is constrained to make a move against the new Trump tariff.

As it is, leading business organizations are already discussing filing a lawsuit against the White House, to which actions on how they will go about it will be decided this Monday (June 03, 2019.) Mr. Murphy commented,

“Imposing tariffs on goods purchased from Mexico is exactly the wrong move… American families and businesses will be paying the tariffs, without solving the very real problems at the U.S. – Mexico border.”

Trump said that imposing tariffs on Mexico is his administration’s way of pressuring Mexico President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to step up with the blocking of Central American migrants to prevent groups from crossing into the U.S border. Trump intends to impose the Mexico tariff until such time the issue concerning the surge of illegal immigrants passing through Mexico, has been resolved.

USCC Analysis of the New Tariff Impact on U.S. States that Import Goods from Mexico

In 2018, imported goods from Mexico totaled $346.5 billion. Should the Trump administration go ahead with the five percent (5%) tariff on Mexico importations, the USCC estimates that American consumers and businesses will be confronted with as much as $17 billion in tax increases.

Yet that is only the initial onus that taxpayers have to shoulder. Since the planned tariff is set to gradually increase at five percent (5%) each succeeding month to reach 25% by October, 2019, the potential tax burden could soar to $86 billion. Trump intends to impose the 25% tariff until Mexico does something to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the U.S. border.

Businesses in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Illinois, Ohio and Arizona regard Mexico as a top trading partner, as importing goods coming from the country has contributed to their economic growth and job opportunities. These states will be the hardest hit, if businesses and consumer will be constrained to pay additional taxes on the goods they import from Mexico.

U.S. Code § 6103: Law Permitting Disclosure of Tax Returns and Related Tax Information to Committees of Congress

Under the Internal Revenue Code, income tax returns and other information related to tax returns can be kept confidential. That is the general rule; but with certain exceptions which Congress passed into law in 1924 under U.S. Code § 6103.

The provision listed exceptions to the confidentiality rule; permitting disclosure of tax returns or related information upon request of certain individuals or examining authority. It was noted that disclosure of tax returns to Committees of Congress, is among the long list of exceptions to the tax information confidentiality rule.

This particular provision is highly relevant to President Trump’s continuing refusal to submit copies of his personal tax returns. Richard Neal, D-Mass of the House Ways and Means, in his capacity as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, had sent a letter to the IRS of the Treasury Department last April 03, 2019. Compliance to the House Committee’s request is expected on or before April 10, 2019.

However, through a new set of lawyers hired by Donald Trump, the president stayed firm on his refusal to furnish Congress with documents and information related to his personal and business tax returns. Trump’s new attorney, William Consovoy sent a 4-page letter seeking to weaken the validity of the reason for which the confidentiality exemption is being invoked.

Trump’s Refusal will Likely Lead to Another Court Battle

Even before House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Neal sent the request, he already anticipated that Trump will do everything possible to keep his personal and business tax information confidential. If necessary, the House Ways and Means Committee intends to bring this matter to court.

Consovoy’s letter is seen as a mere ploy to delay the Treasury Department’s release of the requested documents, whilst awaiting the Justice Department’s position regarding the matter. Not a few regard U.S. Code § 6103 as an obscure provision that requires clarification, as its legislation was an offshoot of the Teapot Dome scandal that involved certain cabinet members of President Harding’s administration.

The Distinction Between Health Law And Health Policy

Centers or institutions for health as well as practitioners like Theodore DaCosta from Gastro Center NJ operate with utmost awareness of healthcare regulations. For the general public, it could be overwhelming to identify and comprehend all the regulations, policies, and laws that relate to the industry of health care as well as to know which governing agency is in authority for the implementation of specific requirements.

Regulations, laws, or policies have a considerable and important function in both the industry of health care and the protection coverage for health care. The different regulatory agencies or bodies keep the general public from several health hazards and offer various public health and welfare programs. Not only are regulations on health care created and carried out by the local, state, and federal government, but also by private groups.

Regulations and standards on health care regulations are essential to make certain of compliance as well as to deliver safe health care to every single person who accesses and avails of the system and programs. Regulatory agencies for health care also keep an eye on facilities and practitioners, give info about any changes or updates, uphold safe and quality services, and make sure of legal adherence.

Health Policy And Health Law Distinctions

Many find the distinction between policy and law to be puzzling, particularly in healthcare and medicine than in other industries which is because of the deeply regulated make-up of organizations that have to do with public health in the United States.

HEALTHCARE LAW

Health care laws are a reference to overall agencies of rules and regulations through which industries of America are obligated to stay in compliance with. Majority of educational institutions see this as an umbrella term for numerous specialized fields such as occupational healthcare, public healthcare, bioethics, global healthcare, infectious disease control and more. This word is often times utilized in connection to the method in which regulations and rules are abided by, instead of the defiance of particular obligatory practices.

HEALTHCARE POLICY

Healthcare policies are a reference to particular rules and regulations that are intended to either attain or avert a specific objective or result concerning the broader extent of public healthcare regulation. Healthcare policies are concrete rules and guidelines that are aimed at bringing initiatives by an organization or the government to specific ends. These policies could be kept as legal measures by the local, state, or federal government of the United States. They may also be carried out by an organization, company, or group in connection with its own procedures. This is generally the outcome of that company or organization complying or abiding to the safety guidelines of as well as for general legal obligations and requirements.

Cohen’s Latest Testimony Could Boost Trump’s Unprecedented Number of Lawsuits

Michael Cohen’s testimony at the hearing conducted by the House Committee on Oversight and Reforms last February 27, 2019, opened a can of worms so to speak. Albeit being discredited for his own conviction mainly as a tax cheat, a perjurer, and a falsifier of documents, Michael Cohen produced documents that serve as starting points from which other related documents will be scrutinized.

As a result, Democrats serving as committee members of the House Judiciary Committee, have sent out 81 requests for documents to different Trump Administration members, as well as to family and associates linked to the Trump Organization and electoral campaign. Through the requested documents, the investigating panel aims to establish whether or not, Michael Cohen’s latest testimony is credible, or just another thread of lies to bring down Donald Trump.

According to House Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA), the results of their investigation will either absolve or implicate Trump and members of his family, staff, advisers, campaign supporters and all others linked to Cohen’s testimony of Trump’s wrongdoings.

House Judiciary Committee’s Probe to Compound Trump’s Political Problems

When asked last Monday if he and every recipient of the document request, intends to cooperate, President Trump signified that he will, as he does all the time and with everybody. However, Trump could not resist adding that the House Judiciary Committee investigation, is a “political hoax.” Furthermore, he suggested that the absence of collusion will render the outcome of the investigation as mertiless.

That is Trump’s view; but not for NY Democrat and Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerrold Nadler. The latter believes that if there is anything that Trump is guilty of, it is that of obstructing justice. Rep. Nadler cited Trump’s public attacks and criticisms on investigators probing his associates and business transactions, as a form of intimidation intended to obstruct justice.

 

House Committee Chairman Nadler explicitly stated,

Over the last several years, President Trump has evaded accountability for his near-daily attacks on our basic legal, ethical, and constitutional rules and norms,”…Investigating these threats to the rule of law is an obligation.

Lawsuits a Norm for Trump

In June 2016, USA Today published a list of legal cases filed in US Federal Courts and in common law courts, totalling about 3500. Trump and his businesses were named either as plaintiffs, defendants or as third party to bankruptcy proceedings. In those cases, 500 claims against Trump were dismissed, while of those with clear resolution, 451 were ruled in Trump’s favor, with only 38 cases ruled otherwise.

At least 100 cases reached extrajudicial settlements that paid out hundreds of thousands; the highest known settlement was in the range of tens of millions.

Lawsuits continued to pour in, even during Trump’s presidency, including one involving a mauling incident ordered by Trump against protesters in Louisville, Kentucky. The numbers continue to rise, with the most recent being the lawsuits filed by political watchdogs, and 16 U.S.states against Trump’s national emergency declaration.

In this aspect, Donald Trump surpasses the record of even the most challenged individual to ever assume office as president of the United States, for having faced and about to face an unprecedented number of lawsuits.